ABBÉ FARIA and the CONSPIRACY
of 1787
by
Alfredo de Mello

Caetano Victorino de Faria, a Brahmin Christian, born in Colvale, in the
north of Bardez district, just on the south bank of the river Chapora,
devoted himself to ecclesiastical studies when young. After taking
lesser orders, he married Rosa de Sousa, daughter of Alexandre de Sousa,
nicknamed Concro, a rich man, of course of Brahmin origin, in the village
of Candolim in the south-west of Bardez near the sea..
It is the custom in India for the bride to enter into the family of the
groom, but in the present case, since the bride was an only daughter, it
was Caetano Victorino who went to live in the house of his father-in-law.
Maybe this exception to the rule gave rise to the dissensions and
unsavoury quarrels that followed. Rosa, as an only daughter, and heiress
of a great fortune, brought up with the indulgence characteristic of these
two attributes, was haughty, with a dominating character, and could not
reconcile herself to life of a married woman, submitting herself to the
power of her husband, as was the hallowed custom, and this gave rise to
perpetual domestic agitation. Caetano Victorino was evidently a man of
strong character, clever and ambitious, because any other lesser man would
have been glad to marry a rich woman, sole heiress, and his role would be
only to procreate and have a good life.
The tribulations that poor Alexandre de Sousa suffered during six years,
without being able to bring about marital peace, mined his health until he
died. As there was no successor, nor hope of his daughter bearing a child,
he willed one third of his inheritance in favour of two nephews, sons of
his brother Manoel de Souza, whose male descendants were known in the
eighteenth century with the common name of Concros.
After seven years' marriage, and exactly ten months after the death of her
father, Rosa gave birth on the 30th May 1756 to a son, who was called Jose
Custodio Faria. He was baptized on the 7th June, as per birth certificate
appearing in Document 49, fol 123: "On the seventh June 1756, I, friar
Manuel de Jesus e Maria with the permission of M.R. Father Fr. Manuel
deAssumpcao, rector of this church Our Lady of Hope of Candolim, baptized,
and put the holy oils to Joseph Custodio, born since eight days, son of
Caetano Victorino de Faria, and Rosa de Sousa. The godfathers were father
Joao Simôes,living in Sirola and Celestina Maria Luiza de Souza, who lives
in this parish." signed: Fr.- Manoel de Jesus Maria.
The birth of the son did not bring about a truce between the parents, who,
in common accord, decided to separate, and Caetano Victorino became a
priest, whilst Rosa de Sousa went to the convent of Santa Monica of Goa,
where she became a nun.
In 1771, Father Caetano Victorino decided to take his son to Europe and
both father and son sailed on the 21st February 1771 on the ship "S.
Jose", on a long but felicitous voyage sailing around the Cape of Good
Hope, and arriving in Lisbon on the 23rd November 1771.
During this voyage, he struck up a friendship with the former Secretary of
State in India, Henrique Jose de Mendanha, who, incidentally, was recalled
and headed for prison in Limoeiro by order of His Majesty, for the blame
of the unsuccessful attempt in the conquest of Piro, against Tippu Sultan,
in the year 1768. The friendship which he made with this judge and other
letters of recommendation which he carried to the Kingdom, opened the way
for Caetano Victorino Faria to acquaint himself with the principal people
in the Court of Lisbon; but during conversations with father Fr.Francisco,
the Poet, the latter recommended him to abstain himself from these
acquaintances, and that he should take a different course, which the
disgraced Mendanha also approved. It must be borne in mind that although
King Jose I reigned, the real ruler was the famous Marquis of Pombal,
Prime Minister.
Faria was recommended to the father master Fr. Joao Baptistade S. Caetano,
a Benedictine, who listened to him, and after a chat of four hours in the
Convent of Estrela, the latter decided to help this priest in his plans,
in view of the fact that caution was needed in such a delicate matter in
the Court. As a result, Fr.Joao Baptista talked to the Nuncio, and
informed favourably regarding Father Caetano Victorino Faria and his son
Jose Custodio.

What were father Caetano Faria's plans in Lisbon, and especially in Rome,
are not known in the documents available today, but it is certain that the
letters he wrote to Goa by the first monsoon (1) after his arrival in
Lisbon, dated 1st February 1772, and addressed to the Pintos of Candolim,
he declared that he was about to travel to Genoa, on the way to Rome,
taking along letters of recommendation of the Nuncio in Lisbon to the
Cardinal, Secretary of State of the Vatican, and other dignitaries of the
Vatican, as well as special instructions; all were made with great caution
and secrecy.
The other channel of introduction of Caetano V. Faria with the Grandees
was through the Counts of S. Vicente, whose son Miguel Carlos da Cunha had
arrived in Goa as a military officer in the year 1756. In fact, he had
gone to India under the name Miguel Carlos de Tavora, and after this
surname was made extinct by law, he adopted the name of da Cunha, which
also belonged to his family. This military officer had married a lady of
poor means, but as a compensation, besides a grant from the royal
Treasury, the Government had given him the coconut grove of Sinquerim,
which had belonged to the Jesuits - who were expelled in 1759 by Marquis
of Pombal, with their property seized by the State - but Miguel Carlos was
prodigal and a great squanderer. With his salary plus the above
mentioned revenues, he could not maintain his family, and he was obliged
to resort to the generosity and alms of the Pintos of Candolim, who were
close friends and neighbours of Father Faria. The latter did not miss the
opportunity to mention to the Count that his son and family were
practically guests of Antonio Joao Pinto. The Count was much obliged and
willing to extend his influence and favour, upon which offer, Father Faria
delivered to the Court a petition in the name of Mr. Ignacio Pinto for
being appointed General Treasurer of the Bulla da Cruzada, which
appointment indeed materialized. All these details are known by a letter
dated first of February 1772 sent by Caetano Victorino Faria to the
aforementioned friend in Candolim, Antonio Joao Pinto. (2)
Incidentally Miguel Carlos da Cunha became eventually a Lieutenant Colonel
and died in 1813, as governor of the fortress of Cabo de Rama, in south
Goa. There were many sarcastic and humourous anecdotes about him; his
extravagancies and ravings were the gossip of Goan society for decades.
Both Farias, father and son went to Rome in 1772, where the older studied
for his doctorate and returned to Lisbon. He left his son Jose Custodio to
enter the College of Propaganda Fide, under the sponsorship of Portugal's
King Jose I. Whilst Father Caetano Victorino became the doyen of the
Goan community in Lisbon, and gave help and recommendations to the
influential people in Court in favour of his countrymen, the son Jose
Custodio finished his course of Theology in 1780, after having become a
priest. In gratitude, he intended to dedicate his Thesis to King Jose his
patron, but since this King had passed away, he dedicated it to the Queen
Maria I and D. Pedro III. (3)
Upon his return to Lisbon, Jose Custodio Faria was invited to preach in
the royal chapel. After climbing the pulpit and facing the Queen,
the King, and the distinguished Court, young Faria started stammering
timidly, but his ever watchful father, hidden underneath the pulpit,
uttered the Konkani injunction "KATOR RE BHAJI" , which nobody else
understood except young Faria. His father ordered him to "snipe away with
the scissor the bhaji vegetable", thereby meaning:" Go ahead, don't be
afraid, you know more than the whole congregation". With this adrenalinic
vocal shot from his father, Jose Custodio delivered an eloquent sermon
which was much appreciated and applauded.
Wily Father Caetano exaggerated his importance in Lisbon to his
countrymen, by leaking to his friends the Pintos of Candolim in Goa, that
he was the confessor of the Queen, but this seems to be a bluff, even
though this title appears in the Great Portuguese-Brazilian Encyclopaedia;
however, this is rebutted in the document N§ 31 of the book of J.H.da
Cunha Rivara, where the author quotes a letter from Inocencio Francisco da
Silva addressed to Mr. Jacinto Caetano Barreto Miranda: "I don't think it
possible to say truthfully that father Caetano Victorino was ever
confessor of the Queen D. Maria I; in the year 1757 in which by decree of
the 19th September, the Jesuits were expelled from the Court...the
following confessors were chosen for the crown princess D. Maria and the
infantas her sisters, viz Father Dr. Jose Pereira de Santa Ana... until
his death on 31st January 1759. In February, the confessor chosen was
Dr.Fr. Ignacio de S. Caetano...who continued until his death at age 69 on
29th November 1788, directing always the conscience of theQueen. He was
suceeeded by D. Jose Maria de Mello, ...bishop of Algarve, and it was
during his ministry that the Queen became mad...Therefore in the interval
between 1757 and 1794, it is not possible to put Caetano Victorino as
confessor of the Queen." (4)
Between the years 1780 and 1785 several Goans had gone to Lisbon, and
logically all flocked to the house of Fr. Caetano Victorino Faria, who was
the unofficial ambassador of his fellow countrymen, inasmuch as he had
managed to have some influence in the Court.
Father Caetano Francisco do Couto, a Goan who had been governor of the
bishopric of Cochin, had been fired by the Portuguese bishop Fr. Manoel de
Santa Catharina. The former sailed to Lisbon in the year 1781, complaining
about the bishop and seeking promotions.
Another father Jose Antonio Goncalves, professor of philosophy in the
seminary of Chorƒo, appointed there by the aforementioned bishop of
Cochin, who was also governor of the archbishopric of Goa, had also been
dismissed. Embittered and discontented with the bishop, he too sailed to
Portugal in the year 1781; and in order to ascend the ladder of hierarchy
in priesthood, he took a degree of doctor in Rome, in the year 1782.
These disgruntled priests gathered in the house of Caetano Victorino Faria
and his son Jose Custodio. Other Goans, including Jose Antonio Pinto of
Candolim, who was a student, and two Vicente brothers, one student in the
navy, by name of Joaquim Antonio, joined in these social gatherings.
Living together, it was natural to talk about things going on in Goa, and
from these debates there arose the first idea of an uprising in Goa, which
would drive the Portuguese out of the Government of the State, and thus
conferring the high posts of running the State to native Goans, especially
to those of the Brahmin caste, to which they all belonged. It seems that
father Caetano Francisco do Couto and Jose Antonio Goncalves aspired to be
promoted to bishops which were then vacant in the Padroado of India,
namely in Craganore, Meliapur and Malacca.
At this time there were in Lisbon two Catanar clergymen, of the Syrian-chaldean
rites in Malabar, originally founded by the Apostle St. Thomas, the
"unbeliever" who had migrated to India around A.D. 43. To this day these
congregations are known as the Syrian Christians and they proliferate
precisely on the southern coast of Malabar. The new Christianity brought
along in the sixteenth century, by the Catholic Portuguese was trying to
dominate these Catanar sects, and caused a schism. Although the lands and
ports were no longer under Portuguese suzerainty, the Padroado granted by
the Pope to Portugal in Asia, still continued in the sphere of religion.
These two Catanar priests managed to get in the good graces of the Queen
D. Maria I who protected them, and also the benevolence of Pope Pius VI,
and in common accord among the two sovereigns, lay and religious, father
Jose Cariate was elected and confirmed as Archbishop of Craganore.

This promotion, the first of its kind, was ill received by the two Goan
fathers, who being of the Latin church, reputed themselves as much more
worthy than the Malabar Syriac to occupy the head of the Craganore See.
They complained to the Secretary of State, Martinho de Mello e Castro, who
listened to them and counselled them to return to Goa, in the certainty
that the Archbishop of Goa, their superior, would grant them promotions
according to their merits. The two Goan priests complained bitterly to the
Secretary of State about the contempt with which the Portuguese treated
them in Goa, and suggested that, instead of sending Portuguese officials
from Lisbon, the administration of the government as well as military and
ecclesiastical jobs be given to the native Goans, who were educated
enough. In this manner, Portugal would get the best advantages from the
State of India, and only thus would it be opulent and happy.
This"paradoxical utopia" (Cunha Rivara dixit) could not be envisioned by
the Government in Lisbon, and such pernicious ideas fomented by these
priests deserved only indifference and contempt. During the government of
Marquis of Pombal, the rights of citizenship of native Goans were
reaffirmed and specifically declared equal to those of the Portuguese from
the Metropolis. The Secretary of State detected that these priests were
primarily interested in becoming bishops, but not in Portugal, as they
were only interested in serving in India.
The two priests Jose Antonio Gonsalves and Caetano Francisco do Couto
returned to India sailing in April 1785 in the fleet of the three ships "Senhor
Jesus Resuscitado", "Santa Zeferina" and "Princeza do Brazil", which
arrived in Goa on the 1st of May 1786. Father Gonsalves landed in Ceylon,
and only travelled to Goa by the beginning of 1787.

A conspiracy was being schemed among a few Goans, and here there were
links with Joseph Francois Dupleix, French Governor of Pondicherry and the
Nawab Tippu Sultan, ruler of Mysore. Dupleix was married to a lady born in
Goa, and known in history as Jan-Begum. Her real name was Joana Albert,
daughter of Isabel Rosa de Castro and a French doctor J. d'Albert, and
granddaughter of a Portuguese Tome Rodrigues de Castro and whose mother
was Indian. Joana de Castro, married to Dupleix, was a great collaborator
of her husband in the Government of Pondicherry and other French
settlements in India. Her proficiency in the languages of the country were
of immense help to Dupleix in his confidential negotiations with the
native princes, and Tippu Sultan in particular. (5)
Tippu Sultan had sent three envoys to France to establish links with King
Louis XVI in Versailles, ostensibly to establish a commercial treaty.
Dupleix had in mind to conquer the island of Goa with the aid of Tippu
Sultan, who would keep for himself all the other territory of Goa adjacent
to the islands of Goa. If this project had taken shape, it is doubtful if
it would serve the interests of the Goan conspirators, as no doubt Dupleix
and Tippu Sultan would have the upper hand, and would leave the
conspirators stranded. The conquest of Goa was dreamed by the French . The
Government of Goa had no inkling of any subversive element within Goa, but
feared the plans of the French and therefore sought diplomacy by means of
cordial correspondence between the Governor Francisco da Cunha e Menezes
with Colonel de Montigni in September/October 1787 who was the French
diplomat in Poona, the seat of the Mahratta kingdom. (6)
However, these projects did not enter seriously in the thoughts of the
French government of Versailles, which had more weighty problems to deal
with at home, Instead, Dupleix was recompensed by being made Marquis, and
decorated with the "cordon rouge".
Tippu Sultan, however, kept in mind the invasion and conquest of Goa, but
other urgent matters, distracted him from this conquest, due to his
skirmishes with the English and other Indian princes.
During 1787 in Goa, the Portuguese Governor had plenty of grave problems
to deal with: on the one hand the declared war against Bounsulo in the
north of Goa, a perpetual enemy and bad neighbour. On the other hand, the
fear of invasion on the part of Tippu Sultan who had conquered the lands
of Canara and Sunda, up to the fortress of Piro on the southern frontier,
lost in 1768. The King of Sunda, despoiled of his domains, sought refuge
in Goa under the Portuguese flag. \

It was between the 31st July and the 5th August that the Governor came to
learn from different sources and places, that a conspiracy was brewing and
would take place on August 10, 1787. On the 31st July, father Pedro
Caetano Lobo, of Bastora, vicar of Tivim, and two other Goan clerygmen had
revealed to the now Archbishop Fr. Manoel de Santa Catharina, what was
going to happen. On the 5th August, the notary of Aldona in Bardez,
Antonio Eugenio Toscano reported to the Governor that some clergymen were
trying to excite the natives to rebel and expel the whites. This
denunciation was not taken seriously by the Governor, but on the same
evening, the commander of the legion of Bardez, Manoel Godinho de Mira,
accompanied by lieutenant Nicolao Luiz da Costa came to inform about the
impending revolt, disclosing the names of the rebels. Consequently
orders were given in secret on August 6 to apprehend the subversive heads
and accomplices.
The leaders of this revolt, nipped in the bud, were none other than the
two disgruntled priests Jose Antonio Goncalves from Piedade, and Caetano
Francisco do Couto, from Pangim. Father Goncalves got wind of the police
action and managed to flee from Goa, disguised, and ending his life exiled
in Calcutta.
Eight other conspirators managed to get away to the Mahratta land, among
whom were the three Noronha brothers, one of them Ignacio, a priest who
fled to Bombay, three other priests Pedro Fernandes, Diogo Caetano do
Couto, and Jose Manoel Ribeiro, and two military petty officers, Gerardo
Ferreira and Pedro Sousa of the legion of Ponda.
A total of fortyseven people were imprisoned, of which fourteen were
priests, including the chief rebel Father Caetano Francisco do Couto and
Joao Baptista Pinto, twelve soldiers, among which one captain, four
lieutenants, and the rest corporals. Among the latter was Manoel Caetano
Pinto, of Candolim, lieutenant of the Ponda legion, his cousin Manoel
Pinto of Saligao, a civilian. One sole Hindu Narba Naique, the Dessai of
Ponda, was made prisoner.
It is intriguing to note that this conspiracy is commonly known in Goa as
the Revolt of the Pintos, when only three Pintos were involved, and one of
them was declared innocent. Later, by a letter intercepted by the
authorities, addressed to his brother father Joao Baptista Pinto already
jailed, it was discovered that the student in Lisbon, Jose Antonio Pinto
was also involved, as he declared his intention to serve in the army of
Tippu Sultan. Lt. Ignacio Caetano Toscano of the legion of Bardez was
evidently the brother of the notary Antonio Eugenio Toscano who denounced
the conspiracy to the Portuguese GovernorFrancisco da Cunha Menezes, 79th
Governor of the "Estado da India".
The news about this conspiracy reached Lisbon only on July 21,1788 by the
mail sent through the ship "Nossa Senhora da Arrabida", and the Secretary
of State Martinho de Mello, imparted instructions to proceed with the law,
and the sentences imposed by the court in Goa. According to the
confessions, the conspirators aimed at subtracting the whole State from
the subjection, obedience and government of Her Majesty, destroy the State
and found a new republic, in which the government would be composed of
Goan natives. Couto and other priests invoked that it was the will of God,
and that they had dispense of the Pope. [While I am writing this chapter,
taking as basis the book of Cunha Rivara, a Portuguese civil servant , I
do believe that this was the first attempt at independence from Portugal,
just two years before the French Revolution of 1789.]

Of the fortyseven, fifteen were hanged on December 13, 1788, mutilated and
decapitated, three served life sentences in the galleys of Angola; two
were sentenced to ten years' prison in Mozambique, five sentenced for life
in the galleys of Goa, and eight were absolved, found innocent, and freed,
including Manoel Pinto of Saligao, the Hindu Narba Naique, Dessai of Ponda,
and Dr. Manoel Francisco Gonsalves, brother of the fugitive Fr. Jose
Antonio Gonsalves.
The Governor knowing full well how embarrassing it would be to pass
judgement on the priests involved in the conspiracy, had them sent to the
Kingdom in Lisbon, as prisoners, who sailed from Goa on March 29, 1789 in
the ship "S. Luis de Santa Magdalena."
In 1802, the vicar of Ponda, Manoel da Expectacao was declared innocent
and returned to Goa.
After eighteen years in prison eight priests were freed and sent back to
Goa, already forgotten by their countrymen. Father Caetano Francisco do
Couto, the ringleader, feigned lunacy when he was interrogated and was
sent to the convent of S. Francisco da Cidade, for medical surveillance,
and finally interned in the Tower of S. Juliao da Barra.
Thus petered out the conspiracy of 1787.
However, the judiciary procedures gave circumstantial evidence that father
Caetano Victorino Faria, the patron of the Goans in Lisbon, was a partner
and had known all the plans of the conspiracy, and when the Secretary of
State learnt about the details of the conspiracy in July 1788, he ordered
some Goans residing in Lisbon to be apprehended, but it was too late. Jose
Antonio Pinto, the two Vicente brothers and Jose Custodio Faria, son of
Caetano Victorino had fled to France, to go back to India overland, and
Jose Antonio Pinto had mentioned to some of his friends in Lisbon, that in
France they would meet the ambassadors of Tippu Sultan in Versailles, as
mentioned before in this narrative. Nothing came of it.(2).

NOTES OF THE AUTHOR
regarding
the failed "Putsch" of 1787 (May 1996)
The foregoing chapter is a resume of the only official account of the
Conspiracy of 1787, written down by a Portuguese bureaucrat, serving as
Secretary of the Governor in Goa, J.H. da Cunha Rivara and printed in Goa
in 1875. There were no written accounts of this episode, by Goan authors,
except for a servile confirmation of the original book "A CONJURACAO DE
1787 EM GOA", written by J. Ismael Gracias in his "Oriente PortuguLs"
in 1908.
When, just five years ago, I learnt for the first time about this Revolt
taking place two years before the momentous French Revolution, the book of
Cunha Rivara seemed to contain blatant inconsistencies. The ferment of
Revolution against the ruling European monarchies was very much ingrained
among educated layers of the colonial empires, ever since the American
Revolution of 1776, which shed off the yoke of the British colonial rule
in America, much to the annoyance of King George III. Could it not be that
this was a real attempt by the Goan elite to achieve self-government and
independence from the Metropolis, just as the thirteen colonies comprising
New England had achieved eleven years before ? I simply could not believe
that the events, causes motives and reasons were those portrayed by Cunha
Rivara.
It was therefore a pleasant surprise recently to get hold of a typewritten
essay in Portuguese, penned by a Goan, Carmo de Noronha, voicing a
different version of the events of 1787 which I had suspected all along.
This postcriptum written almost five years after the foregoing chapter was
written, merit therefore the term "palimpsest". This word means "Paper,
parchment, etc prepared for writing on and wiping out again, like a slate"
and " a parchment, etc which has been written upon twice; the original
writing having been rubbed out". For the sake of the record, I do not wish
to wipe out the contents of Cunha Rivara's book dated 1875. Simply now, in
1996, I wish to do a revision literally, a second seeing, giving an
entirely new perspective of the episode of the year 1787.
Cunha Rivara instead of being a true historian, was only an obsequious
clerk, toeing the official line, and dismissing or down-playing the real
motives of the revolutionary leaders, the intellectual Fr. Caetano
Francisco Couto, and the erudite professor of the College of Chorao,
Fr.Jose Antonio Goncalves, by claiming that these two priests staged this
uprising, out of spite, just because they were not appointed bishops...
The bottom line was that three fellow Goan "quislings", betrayed the
rebels. The whole book of Cunha Rivara reminds me of the scribes rewriting
history in George Orwell's epic novel "1984" or the well-known re-writing
of "Who-is-who" in the history of Stalin's Soviet Union, thus creating
umpteen "Non-persons" who officially had never existed.
In the year 1640, after eighty years of being under the rule of the three
Philips of Spain, it was only natural that the Portuguese should rebel
against foreign rule.
Granted that Albuquerque freed the Hindu Goans from the Muslim rule of
Adil Shah in 1510. But in view of the lapse of History, and of the world
developments - the American Revolution of 1776, and the simmering of pre-French Revolution - was it not natural that the enlightened Goans, after
277 years of ineffectual, decadent and arbitrary rule of Portugal, should
rebel against the powers-that-be, and achieve self-government, which is
precisely what the two leaders specifically stated to the Portuguese
Secretary of State in Lisbon, and which the reader will find underlined in
Cunha Rivara's meticulous account?

Fathers Goncalves and Couto returned to Goa from Lisbon disillusioned;
ensconced in the Couto household in Fontainhas, in the historical "Travessa
do Rego" street, they set their minds to execute the fantastic (but not
unrealistic) plan to get rid of the Portuguese, make Goa an independent
and sovereign State, with its own army, its parliament, its own laws.
Why should Cunha Rivara label these motives as a "paradoxical utopia" and
"such pernicious ideas" ? There is always a latent and noble human
aspiration to be free and lord of one's destiny.
Unfortunately Cunha Rivara, ninety odd years after the fateful events,
showered ridicule on the noble impulse of the Goan people. And he could
pontificate on the matter, on hindsight, because there were three Goan
Judases who betrayed: namely, Antonio Eugenio Toscano, a scribe from
Aldona, brother of the co-conspirator Lt. Toscano, Lt. Nicolau da Costa,
another sycophant of the Ponda Legion, and the priest from Bastora,
Caetano Jose Lobo. These traitors to Goan freedom in 1787, tattletaled to
their respective authorities five days before the Revolt was scheduled to
take place.
Carmo de Noronha (descendant of the three Noronhas who participated in the
revolt ?) states that a military subversion among the native troops would
have been the first in all India against foreigners and forerunner of the
French Revolution. Noronha advances the notion that the leaders of this
Revolt would follow with a kind of Holy War (Jihad in moorish parlance)
through the priests and vicars, preaching the gospel of freedom, from the
pulpits.
History is written by the conquerors, or would-be paladins of the "status
quo". Cunha Rivara bends over backwards to belittle the caliber of leaders
Gonsalves and Couto. Father Caetano Francisco Couto, in view of his high
intellectual and pastoral qualities, had been appointed Governor of the
bishopric of Cochin, by the Archbishop D. Francisco de Assuncao e Brito,
but he was demoted from the post by the Governor of the bishopric of Goa,
Fr. D. Manuel de Santa Catarina, a rabid "reinol", and replaced by one Fr.
Jose de Soledade, a dumb friar, intellectually and culturally inferior.
Frustrated and disillusioned Fr. Couto sailed to Lisbon, to seek justice.
He was accompanied by another Father, much more brilliant and cultured,
father Jose Antonio Goncalves, who later, received a "summa cum laude"
doctorate in Rome, and his merits were recognized in an eloquent speech
delivered by the Holy Office's Fr.Thomas Mamachi.

Likewise, Cunha Rivara glosses over the punishments meted out to the
condemned rebels. All the military men among the rebels were condemned to
die by hanging, but the sentence was carried out in a ferocious and
unseemly manner: they were taken to the place of hanging, behind the
convent of St. Caetano, in Old Goa, tied to horses, and dragged over rough
streets, peppered with stones, which tore into their flesh, before they
were hanged. Furthermore before the hanging, the hands of the Lieutenants
Pedro Gonzaga, Manuel Pinto, the surgeon-general David Viegas, and
corporal Caetano da Costa, were cut off, and after hanging, the heads were
chopped off, and the bodies quartered, and the blood-dripping heads were
exposed on poles, conspicuously in public places, especially in the
locations were they were born. Needless to say that such sadistic
sentences instilled deep fear among the Goan populace, so that people
feared to talk about this aborted revolt.
Since from all the facts gleaned, it is evident that the Pintos of
Candolim, whilst participants, had little to do with this Conspiracy, as
ringleaders. Out of the 47 captured, only three were Pintos, and one of
them, was absolved and freed. Therefore it is highly suspicious why Cunha
Rivara insists on coining the term " he Revolution of the Pintos", and
further by including in his book, a detailed family tree of the Pintos.
It would seem that he wanted to gloss over or belittle the role of the
real leaders, Couto and Gonsalves, and create a smokescreen in order to
minimize the real import of a high-level subversive movement to implant
self-rule in Goa.
The revolt that was nipped in the bud, took place during the period when
the 79th Governor of India, Francisco da Cunha Menezes was governing Goa,
and soon after, the Portuguese conquered the province of Pernem which
became the most northern district of Goa, and in 1791, this Governor
annexed Ponda from the king of Sunda, thus beginning the period of the New
Conquests (Novas Conquistas). Meanwhile, in the Old Conquests, comprising
of Goa island, the district of Bardez, and Salcete the Christianized Goans
nursed their hurt feelings in silence, and according to Carmo de Noronha,
there prevailed the hostile reaction of "that hibrid and truculent race"
of the descendants and mestizos, who displayed their "patriotism" by
ill-treating the true Goans. How important this segment of the population
was remains an unknown factor to me, considering that in the census of
1950 or thereabouts, there were only around 1100 descendants in Goa. It
seems therefore logical that in 1787, the number of "descendants" or
mestizos were fewer, unless during this period of 160 odd years, this "hibrid
race" emigrated back to the Metropolis, which is unlikely.
The Goan historian, Fr. Gabriel Saldanha in his "History of Goa" - which
is rather the History of the Portuguese in Goa and not of the Goans -
written in 1925, also erroneously labels this episode as "Tentativa da
Conjuracao dos Pintos", thus contributing in twisting the real historic
facts, although he admits that the Conspiracy was planned by Frs Goncalves
and Couto, but incongruously labels the failed attempt as the "Revolt of
the Pintos". It is really shameful that this Goan historian, who lived in
the historic house, in Fontainhas, where this Conspiracy was hatched,
should toe the line of the Portuguese chronicler, almost 140 years after,
instead of presenting a cool and true appraisal of the historic facts.
ABBE FARIA

The early life of Abbe Faria is to be found in detail in the previous
chapter dealing with the "Conspiracy of 1787". When the news of the
aborted revolt reached Lisbon, both Farias - father and son - found it
more expedient to flee from Lisbon, and seek refuge in France, early in
1788.
Jose Custodio Faria remained in France, and he later became famous, and
was the talk of the town in Paris. The French Revolution broke out on July 14,
1789.
There he was, at age 32, witnessing the most world shaking events of the
history of the world. The most simple definition of the French Revolution
is the downfall of the monarchy, the King, Queen and aristocrats being
guillotined, and the establishment of a Republic, with the motto "liberte‚,egalite‚
fraternite". This is an erroneous concept because between 1789 and 1795,
there were many ups and downs, undercurrents of different movements,
counter-revolutions, a war against republican France by the monarchies of
Austria, Prussia and Great Britain.
Abbe Faria, as Jose Custodio became known in France, is depicted as a
revolutionary, heading a battalion against the National Convention.
Abbe Faria and his father were implicated in the conspiracy of 1787 in Goa.
Their aim was to make Goa a republic, which, if it had succeeded, would
have been the forerunner of the French Revolution. Yet, Abbe Faria was
anti-Republican in France, and on the 10th Vendimiaire ( 2nd October 1795)
he sided with the royalist "White Terror" which tried to seize power
against the Government of the National Convention, but were crushed by the
young general Napoleon Bonaparte on October 5.
The only explanation can be that the "Declaration of Rights of Man and of
the Citizen" decreed on August 26, 1789 by the National Constituent
Assembly, had been condemned by the Pope as "impious". Later the Church in
France was deprived of its resources, and the Assembly enacted the Civil
Constitution of the Clergy, which was rejected by half of the French
clergy, thereby causing a schism. As a priest, brought up in Rome, he cast
his lot with the royalists, against the "Montagnards and sansculottes".
Apparently his religious upbringing superseded his political convictions.
Little is known about Abbe Faria in Paris until 1792 when his name appears
in the Register of Denouncements, as anti-republican, gambler and
frequenter of the Palais Royal, and the "salons" of the best French
aristocracy.
When order was established after the 5th October 1795, he was appointed
professor of Philosophy in the Academy of Marseilles, where he held his
post just for a year. However, he managed to be elected member of the
Medical Society of the said city. For lack of philosophic training or for
other reasons, he was transferred to the Academy of Nîmes, as an assistant
professor. He bore ill this disqualification, and started working
earnestly on hypnotic practices. Shortly after, he abandoned the
provincial Nimes to return to Paris.
Franz Anton Mesmer, a Vienese physician, who was impressed by the writings
of the Renaissance mystic physician Paracelsus, revised his theories by
postulating that a person may act to transmit universal forces to other
individuals in the form of "animal magnetism". He had to flee from Austria
and went to Paris where he again attracted the antagonism of the medical
profession. In 1784 King Louis XVI appointed a committee of scientists and
physicians to investigate Mesmer's methods. Among the committee's members
were the U.S. inventor Benjamin Franklin and the French chemist Lavoisier,
to examine the phenomenon later dubbed "mesmerism".
Abbe Faria, besides his good relation with the Directory, was friendly
with the Marquis Puysegur, one of the disciples of Mesmer, who initiated
him in the magnetic practices. Abbe Faria started his lectures in August
1813 in the rue Clichy, Paris. The theoretical presentation of his ideas
was heard with annoyance, but the scenes of hypnotism that he performed
with the audience, especially with women were astounding. The curiosity
increased especially because of the strange figure of Abbe Faria, with a
bronze skin, and great height, accentuated by his lean physique, besides
the new doctrines which he sustained and the practical demonstrations of
hypnotism that he carried out with astounding precision.
He cleared up the dominant preconcepts and unexpectedly raised the clamour
of revolt against the current ideas. For him, there was nothing
supernatural about hypnotism. The observation of the cases were made with
astounding impartiality, and the result of his experiences were
conclusive. The hypnotic sleep, concluded Faria, was obtained by
suggestion; there were no special forces of hypnotizers in force; it all
depended on the predisposition of the hypnotized.
His valour manifested itself in the correct vision of the causes of
hypnosis, crumbling false interpretations; but the tenacity and courage
with which he resisted the religious preconcepts of his epoch were not
less noteworthy. The church condemned magnetism. Everything originated
from the action of fluids of infernal origins. A French theologian wrote
that "somnambulism and magnetism were supernatural and diabolic,
anti-Christian, anti-Catholic, and anti-moral".
Abbe Faria studied the magnetic practices and convinced himself of the
inanity of such interpretations. As a priest and believer, he had no
doubts about confronting the ires of the theologians of his time, by
affirming that there was nothing supernatural in such phenomena and that
hypnotic sleep was in the end, a form of suggestion. He became famous as a
magnetizer, so much so that he performed his hypnotism in the vaudeville
show "Magnetismemanie".
He did not manage to get a lifetime pension from the State, and thus,
beaten by adversity, abandoned by those who at first applauded him, a butt
of ridicule, he lived miserably and had to accept a modest job of chaplain
of a nunnery, in order to survive. It is then that he wrote his book,
expounding the doctrines which immortalized him. In the year 1819 when he
died, the first volume of his work was printed "De la cause du sommeil
lucide, ou etude de la nature de l'homme, par l'abbe Faria, Brahmine,
docteur en Theologie". The second and third volumes were unpublished.

Years later, the English physician James Braid (1795-1860) studied its
phenomena and coined the terms hypnotism and hypnosis. For decades James
Braid was recognized as the pioneer investigator of hypnosis, who did much
to dispel the superstitious aura surrounding the phenomenon and who gave
impetus to the development of the French school of neuro-psychiatry.
However in 1925, Professor Egas Moniz, neurosurgeon and winner of the
Nobel Prize, wrote "O Padre Faria na Historia do Hipnotismo" (Father Faria
in the history of hypnotism) overriding the erroneous concept of James
Braid being the father and pioneer of hypnotism. The French physiologist
and anatomist Alberet Pitres had already dedicated a study to Faria, as
also Monsignor Sebastiao Dalgado.
Abbe Faria and his theory of hypnotism was already referred to in the
French magazine MONITEUR of the lst and 5th October 1819, and again in the
newspaper L'ORDRE of the 3rd December 1851; references to him were made by
H. de Cuvillers "Les Archives de Magnetisme Animal" and Hoffmann's
"Oeuvres ComplPtes"
published in 1828. Again he was hailed by Burdin & Dubois in their "Hist.
Acad. du Magnetisme" published in Paris in 1841.(7)
The curious personality of Abbe Faria was very much discussed during his
lifetime. What impact he had in Paris is substantiated by Chateaubriand
presenting him in an extravagant role in his "Memoires d'outre-tombe", and
Alexandre Dumas also used his name in his novel "Count of Monte-Cristo",
displaying him as a prisoner in the Chateau d'If, and revealing to Edmond
Dantes, the existence and secret of the treasures of the island of Monte-Cristo.Thus
a just recognition of Abbe Faria (Abade Faria in Portuguese) as the
founder and inventor of hypnotism is one of the glories of Goa, and his
memory is perpetuated by the statue erected in Panjim in 1945 in the small
plaza next to the Palace of Adil Khan.
Again, in homage of Abbe Faria, Prof. Egas Moniz wrote another paper in
1945, titled "O Abade Faria e o Hipnotismo Científico".
|
FOOTNOTES
(1) Correspondence between Portugal and
India are known, and registered as Book of the Monsoons, through the
centuries, because during the monsoon (June-September) ships could not
ford the river Mandovi. Thus letters from Portugal were sent to India in
September-October, in order to reach Goa before end May, and likewise
correspondence from India was mailed in the period December-February, in
order to reach Lisbon six months later.
(2)J.H. da Cunha Rivara "A Conjuracao de
1787", page 45
(3) Document N§ 50 J.H. da Cunha Rivara :THEOLOGICAE
PROPOSITIONES DE EXISTENTIA DEI, DEO UNO ET DIVINA REVELATIONE sub
Augustissimis Auspiciies Fidelissimorum,Regum, Portugalliae et Algarbiorum,
MARIAE FRANCISCAE ET PETRI III a Josepho Custodio de Faria, Goano,in
Collegio Urbano de Propaganda Fide Alumno , DEFENDENDAE PRAESIDE F. THOMA
MARIA CERBONI, Ordinis Praedicatorum Sacrae Theologiae Magistro, &
Professore in eodem Collegio., Romae CIC. ICCC. LXXX, Tipis Sac.
Congregationis de Propaganda Fide, PRAESIDUM APROBATIONE, MARIAE,
FRANCISCAE , ET , PETRO , III Portugalliae, Algarbiorvmque, Regibvs.
Fidelissimis Piis. Avgvstis, Pacificis, Potentissimis Christianae, Rei,
Ampliclicatoribvs Littteravum. Bonarvumque. Artivm Patronis.
Mvnificentissimis Istas. de. Religione. Theses Svae. in Ipsos.
Observantiae. Memorisq. Animi Pro. Immortalibvs. beneficiis in .se.
Patremqve. Svvm. Conlatis Testimonivm. Sempiternvum, JOSEPHUS. CVSTODIVS .
DE FARIA. GOANVS In Conlegio, Vrbano. de Propaganda, Fide Alvmnvs, O.C.Q.
L.M:
(4) Document N§ 34 page 52-53. J.H. da
Cunha Rivara (ibidem)(5) Prop‚rcia Correia-Afonso de Figueiredo "A Mulher
na India Portuguesa".(6) Document N§ 55 J.H. da Cunha Rivara page 135(7)
Grande Enciclopedia Portuguesa e Brasileira, p. 919-920
|
Source: Memoirs of Goa, Alfredo
de Mello (Chapter 18
—
posted on Goanet)
Artwork:
Dom Martin
Home
Page
|